Reflecting on the Role of IT and IT Research in Healthcare: Moving Healthcare Research into Practice
نویسندگان
چکیده
Today’s healthcare organizations face challenges of unprecedented complexity, breadth and intensity. Only a fraction of new scientific discoveries enter day-to-day clinical practice. To aid in the implementation of research into practice, healthcare organizations frequently turn to technology. However, even with the aid of technology, research often fails to be fully integrated into patient treatment. Part of the reason is due to the complexity of the healthcare system, which includes patients, providers, management, and local community input, all of which are influenced by the current political and economic environment. In addition, some authors have noted that studies have often lacked a rigorous scientific approach that would aid in predicting success in future implementations. Panelists will consider how the foundation theories and research in IT, as well as information technology itself, can be used to inform and facilitate the implementation of healthcare research into practice. Participation from the audience will be encouraged. Panel Objectives This panel seeks to broaden understanding of and spark new ideas on how IT research, its foundational theories and information technology itself can aid in implementing healthcare research into practice. Questions addressed will include: 1) What theories used for IT research can aid practitioners seeking to implement researchbased evidence into practice? And 2) How can information technologies and systems themselves be used to bring research into healthcare settings? Panel Layout The panel would consist of the moderator and 3 discussants. The moderator will begin with a brief introduction to the subject and discussants and the posing of question 1 above (5 minutes). The discussants and moderator will highlight the theoretical perspectives they have used in past research or areas where their thoughts are evolving. This will take 5-7 minutes each for a total of 20-28 minutes. Discussants and the moderator will then address question 2 above for 16-20 minutes. The remainder of the time will be spent asking audience members for their perspectives on the questions posed and fielding questions for the discussants from the audience. Proposed Panelists Moderator – Priscilla A. Arling, College of Business, Butler University. Priscilla Arling studies the intersection of IT, social networks and knowledge management in the healthcare field. She has published in the International Journal of Reliable and Quality e-Healthcare, the International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics, and the Handbook of Healthcare Delivery Systems. Her work in the area has also been presented at the Gerontological Society’s annual meeting, the Workshop on Health IT and Economics, and HICSS. Panelists who have agreed to participate: Gordon Gao – R.H. Smith School, University of Maryland Guodong (Gordon) research interests include health IT and quality transparency. Dr. Gao has been conducting pioneering work on the digitized information in transforming healthcare, including physician usage of new technology, and role of empowered patients such as online doctor ratings by patients. His research has been published in top-tier journals like Management Science, Information Systems Research, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, and Journal of Management Information Systems. His work is also presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, the Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, INFORMS. Dr. Gao initiated and cochaired the annual Workshop on Health IT and Economics (WHITE 2010-2012), held in Washington DC. His work has been funded by AHRQ. Richard Klein – College of Business and Behavioral Science, Clemson University Rich researches electronic business initiatives within the healthcare industry focusing on office-based practices use Internet-based purchasing of medical supplies as well as electronic medical records (EMR) implementations and integration with other providers’ systems. His research has been published in Decision Sciences, the European Journal of Information Systems, the Journal of Management Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, and the Journal of Operations Management. Further, Rich has presented his work at national and international conferences, including the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, the Americas Conference on Information Systems, the European Conference on Information Systems, and the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Annual Meeting. E. Vance Wilson – School of Business, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Vance Wilson currently chairs the Special Interest Group on Information Technology in Healthcare (SIG-Health) of the Association for Information Systems (AIS). He has served as supervising editor of the Information Systems and Healthcare Department of Communications of the AIS since 2004, and he has guest-edited special issues on e-health and health information systems in European Journal of Information Systems, e Service Journal, Information Systems Management, and the International Journal of Healthcare Technology Management. In 2009 he produced the edited book, Patient-Centered E-Health. Equipment Needs: A projector and cord to connect to a laptop to display any material needed. Panelists will provide laptops if they need them. This application is supported by the AIS Special Interest Group on IT in Healthcare (SIG-Health)
منابع مشابه
It Is Not That Simple nor Compelling!; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
Healthcare decisions are often made under pressure, with varying levels of information in a changing clinical context. With limited resources and a focus on improving patient outcomes, healthcare managers and health professionals strive to implement both clinical and cost-effective care. However, the gap between research evidence and health policy/clinical practice persists despite our best eff...
متن کامل“Horses for Courses”; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-Faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
This commentary considers the vexed question of whether or not we should be spending time and resources on using multifaceted interventions to undertake implementation of evidence in healthcare. A review of systematic reviews has suggested that simple interventions may be just as effective as those taking a multifaceted approach. Taking cognisance of the Promoting Action on Research Implementat...
متن کاملThe Many Meanings of Evidence: Implications for the Translational Science Agenda in Healthcare
Health systems across the world are concerned with the quality and safety of patient care. This includes investing in research and development to progress advances in the treatment and management of individuals and healthcare organisations. The concept of evidence- based healthcare has gained increasing currency over the last two decades; yet questions persist about the time it takes for new re...
متن کاملPatient Choice Has Become the Standard Practice in Healthcare Provision: It is Time to Extend its Meaning; Comment on “Is Patient Choice the Future of Health Care Systems?”
The key argument of this commentary is that patient choice has a broader meaning than suggested by consumerist choice models. In increasingly marketized health care systems with diversified and knowledge-based service arrangements, patients are continuously obliged to choose insurers, physicians or hospitals and treatments—whether they like it or not. However, health care users refer to a wide ...
متن کاملUsing Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation
Many representations of the movement of healthcare knowledge through society exist, and multiple models for the translation of evidence into policy and practice have been articulated. Most are linear or cyclical and very few come close to reflecting the dense and intricate relationships, systems and politics of organizations and the processes required to enact sustainable improvements. We illus...
متن کاملHealthcare Reimbursement and Quality Improvement: Integration Using the Electronic Medical Record; Comment on “Fee-for-service Payment - an Evil Practice That Must Be Stamped Out?”
Reimbursement for healthcare has utilized a variety of payment mechanisms with varying degrees of effectiveness. Whether these mechanisms are used singly or in combination, it is imperative that the resulting systems remunerate on the basis of the quantity, complexity, and quality of care provided. Expanding the role of the electronic medical record (EMR) to monitor provider practice, patient r...
متن کامل